شناسایی و اولویت بندی عوامل کلیدی موفقیت اجرای مدیریت زنجیره تامین پایدار با استفاده از رویکرد ترکیبی Dematel-ANP در صنعت خودرو ایران

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد/ دانشگاه

2 مدرس/دانشگاه

چکیده

وجود مشکلات متعدد اجتماعی، اقتصادی و زیست محیطی سازمان‌ها را به سمت استفاده از مدیریت زنجیره تأمین پایدار هدایت کرده و از سویی جهانی‌سازی باعث شده است اجرای موفق مدیریت زنجیره تامین پایدار همواره به عنوان یکی از دغدغه های مدیران به ویژه در صنعت خودرو قرار گیرد. در نتیجه با توجه به ضرورت بکارگیری مدیریت زنجیره تامین پایدار در سازمان ها، مساله اساسی رسیدن به یک مدیریت زنجیره تامین پایدار موفق و کارآمد می-باشد. در این راستا، این پژوهش بر آن است تا با بررسی ادبیات مربوط به عوامل موفقیت مدیریت زنجیره تامین پایدار، عوامل کلیدی که در اجرای موفقیت آمیز مدیریت زنجیره تامین پایدار در صنعت خودرو موثر می باشند را با استفاده از نظر خبرگان و بکارگیری روش دلفی فازی شناسایی کرده و با کمک روش دنپ (دیمتل- ای ان پی)، به تعیین اهمیت و رتبه‌بندی این عوامل در اجرای مدیریت زنجیره تامین پایدار بپردازد. نتایج تحقیق، 25 عامل کلیدی را برای اجرای موفق مدیریت زنجیره تامین پایدار در صنعت خودرو شناسایی و مشخص نمود که از این میان سه عامل تعهد و حمایت مدیریت ارشد، برنامه ریزی استراتژیک و چشم انداز بلند مدت و بازرسی زیست محیطی تامین کنندگان به ترتیب به عنوان مهمترین عوامل و یکپارچه سازی عملکرد متقابل (تشکیل کار گروه) به عنوان کم اهمیت‌ترین عامل مشخص شدند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Identification and Ranking of Critical Success Factors for the Implementation of Sustainable Supply Chain Management Using Dematel-ANP Hybrid Approach in the Automobile Industry of Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mahmood Yahyazadehfar 1
  • seyed Javad Alavi Tabari 2
1 professor/ university
2 professor
چکیده [English]

There are multiple problems of social, economic and environmental have led to organizations towards the use of sustainable supply chain management and on the one hand, globalization has made successful implementation of sustainable supply chain management always a concern for managers, especially in the automobile industry. As a result, due to the need for the use of sustainable supply chain management in organizations, it is essential to achieve a successful and efficient sustainable supply chain management. In this regard, this study aims to detect critical factors that are effective in the successful implementation of sustainable supply chain management in the automobile industry by review the literature and using experts' viewpoints and Fuzzy Delphi method, as well as by using DANP, it determines the importance and ranking of these factors in the implementation of sustainable supply chain management. Research results determined 25 critical factors for the successful implementation of sustainable supply chain management in the automobile industry that of these, the top management commitment and support, strategic planning and long-term vision and environmental auditing for suppliers, were identified as the most important factors, respectively and cross-function integration as the least important.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Automobile industry
  • Critical Success Factors
  • Dematel – ANP
  • fuzzy Delphi
  • Sustainable supply chain management
1-      Adamkó, A., Kãdek, T., Kósa, M. (2014). Intelligent and adaptive services for a smart campus, Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom), 505-509.

2-      Ahmad, S.D., Pujiyono & Manthovani, R. (2018). Legal Liability of Parent Company on Subsidiary’s Bankruptcy in Indonesia, International Journal of Trend in Research and Development, 5(1), 312-315.

3-      Asadzadeh, A. & RahmanSeresht, R. (2016). A Model for Explaining Intelligence in Holding Companies, Journal of Business Management. 7(4), 805-822. (in Persian)

4-      Azar, A., Rahnavard, F. & Musalmani, Gh. H. (2015). Designing a Strategy for the Formulation of Industry Strategy; Examining the Petrochemical Industry, Management Process and Development, Vol. 28, 4(84), 61-71. (in Persian)

5-      Bali, R. K., Wickramasinghe, N. & Lehaney, B. (2009). Knowledge Management Primer, Publisher Routledge, ISBN: 1135850798, 9781135850791, 142 pages.

6-      Charmaz, K. (2008). What is Grounded Theory? In: NCRM Research Methods Festival 2008.

7-      Conteh, C. (2014). Canadian public administration in the 21st century. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. Retrieved from ProQuest database.

8-      Dadkhah, S., Bayat, R., Fazli, S., Tork, E. K., & Ebrahimi, A. (2018). Corporate foresight: developing a process model. European Journal of Futures Research, 6(1), 1-10. 

9-      DanaiFard, H. (2012). Designing a National Observatory for Political and Management Studies in the Islamic Republic of Iran: Theoretical Wisdom, Operational Conceptualization and Challenges, Quarterly Journal of Science and Technology, 4 (4), 13-24. (in Persian)

10-  Dominik G. (2013). The Holding Company as an Instrument of Companies’ Tax-Financial Policy Formation, International Journal Contemporary Economics, 7(1) 75-82.

11-  Farhangi, A., Karoubi, M. & Alvaziri, S. (2015). Classical Grounded Theory; Descriptive Proposed Generation Theory of the Permissible Identity Gravity Center for Iranian Health Tourism, Journal of Business Management, 7(1), 75-86. (in Persian)

12-  Forster, B. (2014). Technology foresight for sustainable production in the German automotive supplier industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 92, 237-248. http://www. dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.09.010.

13-  Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory, Aldine Publishing Company. Chicago.

14-  Glaser, B. (1965). Examples of grounded theory: A reader, Sociology Press. Mill Valley, CA.

15-  Goodarzi, G. R., Azar, A., Azizi, F. & Babaei Meybodi, H. (2016). Providing the proposed regional prospecting framework as an interdisciplinary field of study: the study document, the development document of Yazd province, Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 8(2), 133-155. (in Persian)

16-  Goold, M., Campbell, A., & Alexander, M. (1994). Corporate level strategy: Creating Value in the Multi Business Company. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

17-  Hasangholipour, H., Gholipour, A., ghazimahaleh, M. M. & Arbatani, T. R. (2010). Requirements, necessities and mechanisms of knowledge commercializing in Management Schools/ Faculties. Journal of business Management, 2(6): 41-61. (In Persian)

18-  Hasrati, Mostafa. (2006). an Introduction to the Qualitative Method of Foundation Data Theory, Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(3), 75-86. (in Persian)

19-  Hatto P. (2010). Standards and Standardisation. A practical guide for researchers. European Commission. Directorate-General for Research & Innovation.

20-  Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 997–1010.

21-  Højland, J. and Rohrbeck, R. (2018) 'The Role of Corporate Foresight in Exploring New Markets: Evidence from 3 Case Studies in the BOP Markets', Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, January, pp. 1-13.

22-  Hwang, D. (2014). Smart approach to innovative education for 21st century, in International Conference IITE-2014 “New Challenges for Pedagogy and Quality Education: MOOCs, Clouds and Mobiles. Moscow.

23-  Kalaki, Hassan. (2009). Fundamental theory as a method of theorizing, called cultural research, 3(6), 119-140.

24-  Karimi, M. (2015). A new generation of oil contracts and the need to create a "technology observatory" center in the oil industry, Research Institute of Petroleum Industry, 137 21-24. (in Persian)

25-  Mehr Al-Hassani, M.H., Haghdoust, A.A., Dehnouyeh, R., Abolhajlaj M., Emami, M. (2016). Providing a proposed framework for monitoring the health system, Iranian Journal of Epidemiology, 12, 92-96. (in Persian)

26-  Noruzi, H. & Movahedifar, E. (2015). Research Methodology Thesis Writing for Management Students: With Warp PLS Software, Mehraban Nashr, Tehran, Iran. (in Persian)

27-  Ramadan, W. A. (2017). Corporate Future Foresight in Government: A necessity or a luxury?, Thesis. Rochester Institute of Technology. Accessed from, Rochester Institute of Technology, RIT Scholar Works.

28-  Rohrbeck R, Gemu¨nden HG (2011). Corporate Foresight: its three roles in enhancing the innovation capacity of a firm. Technol Forecast Social Change 78(2):231–243

29-  Rohrbeck, R., Battistella, C., & Huizingh, E. (2015). Corporate foresight: An emerging field with a rich tradition. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 101, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.002

30-  Rupsiene, L. & Pranskuniene, R. (2010). The variety of grounded theory: Different versions of the same method or different methods? Social Sciences, 4(70): 7-19.

31-  Savioz, P. (2004), "Technology Intelligence Concept Design and Implementation in Technology-based SMEs", Palgrava Macmillan.

32-  Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 2nd Edition, Sage. Thousand Oaks, CA.

33-  Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

34-  Vecchiato R, Roveda C. (2010). Foresight in corporate organisations. Technol Anal Strat Manag, 22 (1), 99–112.

35-  Voros, J. (2003). A generic foresight process framework. Foresight, 5(3), 10–21.

36-  Wyrwicka, M. K. & Erdeli. O. (2018). Strategic Foresight as the Methodology of Preparing Innovation Activities, Marketing and Management of Innovations, DOI 10.21272/mmi, 2-26.